Just a yes or no would be sufficient. Anyone? :P
oliverw wrote: > > Is a construct like this supported: > > <wicket:link><a href="Page1.html"><img > src="/img/Page1.gif" alt="Page" > /></a></wicket:link> > > I'm asking because I'm getting really strange results when using it. > Initially everything looks ok but after hitting the backbutton, the image > is suddenly in the page history as if it was a stand-alone page. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wicket%3Alink-with-images-supported--tp15280790p15287057.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
