Yes I've seen that too but I wanted to make sure that I did not overlook something.
Nino.Martinez wrote: > > Look in the source? > > Thats my best bet... Looking a this it does not look that way: > > http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html > > http://wicket.apache.org/examplenavomatic.html > > oliverw wrote: >> Just a yes or no would be sufficient. Anyone? :P >> >> >> oliverw wrote: >> >>> Is a construct like this supported: >>> >>> <wicket:link><a href="Page1.html"><img >>> src="/img/Page1.gif" alt="Page" >>> /></a></wicket:link> >>> >>> I'm asking because I'm getting really strange results when using it. >>> Initially everything looks ok but after hitting the backbutton, the >>> image >>> is suddenly in the page history as if it was a stand-alone page. >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > Nino Martinez Wael > Java Specialist @ Jayway DK > http://www.jayway.dk > +45 2936 7684 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/wicket%3Alink-with-images-supported--tp15280790p15289911.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
