Interesting. So
model.getFirstName()
would return a PropetyModel based on the results of proxy.eval()? If
I understand you correctly that creates many models (one per
component) instead of reusing a single model, but that may well not be
the end of the world. Or does getFirstName() return a CompoundModel
that is properly bound this this component? Intriguing none the less.
I hadn't considered this option, but I'm going to play with it a bit.
I rather like that direction.
On Feb 8, 2008 8:29 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i try to look at this this weekend, but i have a quick question
> I find it a bit verbose can't it be a bit shorter like this (just an
> example)
>
> SharedPropertyModel<Customer> model = new
> SharedPropertyModel<Customer>(customer);
> this.setModel(model);
>
> FormComponent firstName = new CustomerNameField("firstName",
> model.getFirstName()).setRequired(true);
> add(firstName);
>
> where getFirstName() returns the model
>
> johan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2008 6:57 PM, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > One of our more clever developers created a CompoundPropertyModel that
> > uses a cglib proxy to strongly bind the mutators to the model. It
> > looks like this:
> >
> > SharedPropertyModel<Customer> model = new
> > SharedPropertyModel<Customer>(customer);
> > this.setModel(model);
> >
> > FormComponent firstName = new
> > CustomerNameField("firstName").setRequired(true);
> > model.bind(firstName).to().getFirstName();
> > add(firstName);
> >
> > FormComponent lastName = new
> > CustomerNameField("lastName").setRequired(true);
> > model.bind(lastName).to().getLastName();
> > add(lastName);
> >
> > FormComponent addr1 = new
> > AddressField("address1").setRequired(true);
> > model.bind(addr1).to().getAddress().getAddress1();
> > add(addr1);
> >
> > FormComponent addr2 = new AddressField("address2");
> > model.bind(addr2).to().getAddress().getAddress2();
> > add(addr2);
> >
> > FormComponent city = new CityField("city");
> > model.bind(city).to().getAddress().getCity();
> > add(city);
> >
> > We're happy to share if folk like this approach. N.B. that the .to()
> > call is for readability rather than out of any necessity.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Scott
> >
> > --
> > Scott Swank
> > reformed mathematician
> >
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
