+1 for complete removal... sf.net will always serve up the binaries, but no need leaving the rest of the entrails lying around.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > can we remove the old website? > or do we still need it for the 1.2.x releases? > > Gerolf > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Kevin Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Igor Vaynberg wrote: > > > and now its assigned...most of the core team is away on holiday... > > > > > > > > On the same theme of "Wicket web presence needs some work", I just > > created jira ticket 1375: "wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart is > > totally obsolete and too easily found in search engines". > > > > "The whole http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart/ tree makes > > Wicket look like a dead or dying project. If it hasn't been updated > > since 2006, I assume it should just be replaced with redirects to the > > current Quick Start page on the main Wicket site > > (http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html) ...." > > > > -Kevin > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
