Whats wrong with
/resources/images/xxx.jpg
On 3/31/08, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To Igor and James:
>
> >so if that is all it does why does it need to be a component?
>
> >Why do you need it to be a component? Are you controlling the
> >visibility of it via code?
>
> #1, I need to add(IBehavior) to the img's to make change to their class
> attribute, so I need them to be a component.
>
> #2, I don't like img src attributes in template like this:
>
> src="resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png"
> src="resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/close.png"
> src="resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/north.png"
> src="resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/sourth.png"
> etc
>
> This would break if I re-name the component or move it to a different
> package. It would be better if they are:
>
> src="open.png"
> src="close.png"
> src="north.png"
> src="sourth.png"
> etc
>
> and change the src attribute to full paths in code. The little PackageImage
> class solve this use case.
>
> >so i would say, no, it takes 10 minutes to write one
>
> I completely agree it's very trivial to create.... after getting help here
> :) Still I commit error by holding on to Class reference (thanks for
> pointing out). If there is such class built-in, then no chance for such
> error and this use case is taken care of.
>
> >i can come up with at least 10 trivial classes that have to do with images
> off the top of my head
>
> Well, this is the thing: you know Wicket inside out. Stuffs that are trivial
> for you may not be so trivial to regular Wicket user. But I totally
> understand your reluctance to add stuff to Wicket. It's like adding key
> words to Java, the answer is almost always "no". So if not adding these
> "little trivial" stuff, a wiki showing all the "little image" use cases
> would be great.
>
> Anyway, I am not happy with my little PackageImage class. I want to allow
> application to override the image files to have different look and only
> fallback to the built-in images, just like localization. How can this be
> done?
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:35 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >wicket:link doesnt touch components afaik
> > >
> > > :((((( I need it to be a component. My code is basically this:
> > >
> > > add(new WebMarkupContainer("img"));
> >
> > Why do you need it to be a component? Are you controlling the
> > visibility of it via code?
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
