Errr, or you could use the Image component, with a standard package
resource?
Regards,
Alastair
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > src="resources/com.mycompany.component.MyComponent/open.png"
>
> or just <wicket:link><img src="open.png"/></wicket:link>
>
> > >so i would say, no, it takes 10 minutes to write one
> >
> > I completely agree it's very trivial to create.... after getting help
> here
> > :) Still I commit error by holding on to Class reference (thanks for
> > pointing out). If there is such class built-in, then no chance for
> such
> > error and this use case is taken care of.
>
> so you make the same error in some other component you write. this is
> just something you have to be aware of.
>
> > Well, this is the thing: you know Wicket inside out. Stuffs that are
> trivial
> > for you may not be so trivial to regular Wicket user. But I totally
> > understand your reluctance to add stuff to Wicket. It's like adding
> key
> > words to Java, the answer is almost always "no". So if not adding
> these
> > "little trivial" stuff, a wiki showing all the "little image" use cases
> > would be great.
>
> what you have done you could have done after reading wicket in action,
> or some other book. resource handling is something framework specific,
> so you have to invest a little learning time.
>
> > Anyway, I am not happy with my little PackageImage class. I want to
> allow
> > application to override the image files to have different look and only
> > fallback to the built-in images, just like localization. How can this
> be
> > done?
>
> src=getstring("somekey",null,"defaultvalue");
>
> -igor
>
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:35 AM, James Carman <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > >wicket:link doesnt touch components afaik
> > > >
> > > > :((((( I need it to be a component. My code is basically this:
> > > >
> > > > add(new WebMarkupContainer("img"));
> > >
> > > Why do you need it to be a component? Are you controlling the
> > > visibility of it via code?
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
