right. if you strip sessionid then all your nonbookmarkable urls will
resolve to a 404. that will probably drop your rank a lot faster....

-igor


On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the problem is that then you have to have all stateless pages. Else google
>  can't crawl your website.
>  And if that is the case then you could be completely stateless so you dont
>  have a session (id) to worry about at all.
>
>  johan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Zappaterrini, Larry <
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  > When Google asks to not have special treatment for their bot, they are
>  > referring to content more than anything. Regarding the session id being
>  > coded in the URL, see the Technical guidelines section of Google's
>  > Webmaster Guidelines -
>  > http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769#desi
>  > gn
>  >
>  > It specifically recommends "allow(ing) search bots to crawl your sites
>  > without session IDs or arguments that track their path through the
>  > site."
>  >
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 7:35 AM
>  > To: [email protected]
>  > Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
>  >
>  > isnt google always saying that you shouldn't alter behavior of your site
>  > depending of it is there bot or not?
>  >
>  > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Artur W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > >
>  > > Hi!
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > igor.vaynberg wrote:
>  > > >
>  > > > also by doing what you have done users with cookies disabled wont be
>  > > > able to use your site...
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > > In my opinion session id is a problem. Google index the same page
>  > again
>  > > and
>  > > again.
>  > >
>  > > About the users without cookies we can do like this:
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >        static class Unbuffered extends WebResponse {
>  > >
>  > >                 private static final String[] botAgents = {
>  > "onetszukaj",
>  > > "googlebot",
>  > > "appie", "architext",
>  > >                        "jeeves", "bjaaland", "ferret", "gulliver",
>  > > "harvest", "htdig",
>  > >                        "linkwalker", "lycos_", "moget",
>  > "muscatferret",
>  > > "myweb", "nomad",
>  > > "scooter",
>  > >                        "yahoo!\\sslurp\\schina", "slurp", "weblayers",
>  > > "antibot", "bruinbot",
>  > > "digout4u",
>  > >                        "echo!", "ia_archiver", "jennybot", "mercator",
>  > > "netcraft", "msnbot",
>  > > "petersnews",
>  > >                        "unlost_web_crawler", "voila", "webbase",
>  > > "webcollage", "cfetch",
>  > > "zyborg",
>  > >                        "wisenutbot", "robot", "crawl", "spider" }; /*
>  > and
>  > > so on... */
>  > >
>  > >                public Unbuffered(final HttpServletResponse res) {
>  > >            super(res);
>  > >         }
>  > >
>  > >        @Override
>  > >        public CharSequence encodeURL(final CharSequence url) {
>  > >             return isAgent() ? url : super.encodeURL(url);
>  > >        }
>  > >
>  > >                private static boolean isAgent() {
>  > >
>  > >                        String agent =
>  > >
>  > >
>  > ((WebRequest)RequestCycle.get().getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest().ge
>  > tHeader("User-Agent");
>  > >
>  > >                        for(String bot : botAgents) {
>  > >                                if (agent.toLowerCase().indexOf(bot) !=
>  > -1)
>  > > {
>  > >                                        return true;
>  > >                                }
>  > >                        }
>  > >
>  > >                        return false;
>  > >                }
>  > >    }
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > I didn't test this code but I do similar thing in my old application
>  > in
>  > > Spring and it works.
>  > >
>  > > Take care,
>  > > Artur
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > > View this message in context:
>  > >
>  > http://www.nabble.com/Removing-the-jsessionid-for-SEO-tp16464534p1646739
>  > 
> 6.html<http://www.nabble.com/Removing-the-jsessionid-for-SEO-tp16464534p16467396.html>
>
>
> > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  > ______________
>  >
>  > The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or
>  > confidential. If you are not the
>  > intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do
>  > not disclose,
>  > distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender
>  > immediately. In addition,
>  > please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to
>  > archiving and review by
>  > persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
>  > _____________
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to