Would subclassing your wicket RequestCycle work? That's where I'm
doing similar authentication stuff right now and it seems to be
working well. It seems like Session is harder to integrate with
external apps since actions can happen that it's unaware of. If you
use RequestCycle you can check cookies, tokens, etc, on each request,
which is really where you want to do it since you have no idea if the
user did something (like logout) in the external app.
Alex
On Apr 15, 2008, at 1:22 PM, mfs wrote:
Yeah i need to..i.e. the very authentication token so that for
subsequent
request i cant avoid the authentication call..
Well i can opt for HttpSession but then i will be using the same
wherever in
my pages i need it (there are a couple of scenarios where i need to
pass the
info back), and hence compromising the abstraction wicket provides..
Johan Compagner wrote:
if there is no session
do you already want to store something?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:10 AM, mfs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guys,
Please comment..
I have a non-wicket AuthenticationFilter which is intercepting all
request
to my wicket-app and checking if the request is coming in from a
valid
user.
Basically in the url am passed over an authenticationToken (by
another
application where the user has signed in already). Now in my
AuthenticationFilter i check if that is a valid token and if yes i
want
to
set some attribute (isAuthenticated etc) in wicket-session, .
The problem is that the wicket session has yet not been created
(because
this is the first request to the wicket app, intercepted by the
filter),
and
hence i get this error "you can only locate or create sessions in
the
context of a request cycle", when i try do a Session.get().
I am already using WicketSessionFilter which would expose my wicket
session
to my non-wicket filter. The problem is just for the first
request, where
a
wicket session yet doesnt exist.
I am thinking of using HttpSession directly in my filter and store
all
the
session data there, but before i do so, i thought to check if
anyone has
a
better work around, ideally i would want to avoid using it.
Thanks in advance
Farhan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Can-only-locate-or-create-session-in-the-context-of-a-request-cycle.-tp16693084p16693084.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Can-only-locate-or-create-session-in-the-context-of-a-request-cycle.-tp16696797p16703394.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
