1 of our finally blocks calls first a response.close() without
try/catch around that and then unset the threadlocals, i think the
response.close does somehow in some situations throws an exception, i
dont know which one but i build a try catch around it.

On 4/17/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we dont even know if it is something in wicket that is causing this
> yet...johan what exactly did you find out?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Ned Collyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >  Edvin Syse wrote:
> >  >
> >  > No, it has not. Johan said he fixed a bug that might have been this
> >  > problem, but I haven't been able to confirm it yet, as the fix is in
> >  > 1.3-SNAPSHOT, and I ran into some issues when deploying with the
> >  > snapshot-version.
> >  >
> >  > I see this problem 10-20 times every day still..
> >  >
> >  > -- Edvin
> >  >
> >
> >  I hope we see a non snapshot release soon.  This sounds like a doozy of a
> >  bug - show stopper for everyone!
> >  --
> >  View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Invoulentary-session-sharing-leakage-in-Wicket-1.3.x-tp16550360p16735844.html
> >
> > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to