Look in the section "Laguage Proposals" > "Shorter Instance Creations" in: http://blogs.sun.com/dannycoward/resource/Java7Overview_Prague_JUG.pdf
Other useful links: http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/resource/java-se-7-EclipseCon-2007.pdf http://puredanger.com/techfiles/java7.pdf -----Original Message----- From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 7:47 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on generics with Wicket really? i still cant find information what will really be 1.7.. On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In java 1.7 it will allow: TextField<Stirng> tf = new TextField("id"); > So, at least one of your wishes will come true ;o) > > I like the default idea. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 4:15 AM > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Re: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on > generics with Wicket > > If only... if only > we had this construct: > > class Component<T default Void> > { > } > > then all our problems with verbosity would be gone.. > > TextField tf = new TextField("id") // just default Void > > Also only declare it once: > > TextField<Stirng> tf = new TextField("id"); > > > And both ways type guessing, so > > TextField<String> tf = new TextField("id", new Model()); //textfield > and model are both just <String> or TextField tf = new TextField("id", > new Model<String>()); // text field gets the type of its given model.. > > I guess we should make a feature request for sun and then Vote on it > with all of us! > (and make noise on the internet...) > > johan > > > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Marcus Mattila > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > generics for formcomponents do not make sense, most of the time > > > they > > > > can figure out the type by inspecting their model. further, > > > generics > > > > did not get rid of the need to specify the type as a constructor > > > argument: new TextField<Integer>("num", Integer.class) > > > > Agreed. > > > > +1 for NOT generifying everything, because most components are "set > > +it > > and forget it" => generifying everything is unnecessary clutter. > > > > I will continue to use Wicket whatever is decided, though :) > > > > -Marcus > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
