On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've been thinking about the way in which wicket is an MVC framework and >> whether people use it according to the MVC pattern. > > The MVC pattern is bastardized - especially when it comes to web > application frameworks - up to the point that it is hardly useful to > use the term. Everyone seems to have their own interpretation. > > If you had to explain Wicket in MVC terms, my take would be that > components represent the Controller and View (together, just like > Swing), and the model is separated behind the IModel interface. But I > think it is better to just let the whole MVC mania behind us and > explain frameworks on their own terms :-)
You could argue that the "view" is the markup file and the "controller" is the component/page class? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
