you mean taking a piss? -igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Rodolfo Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Igor, stop taking the piss... > > What he means is: Wicket is *NOT* an MVC framework... > > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Sven Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Well, in Wicket the markup doesn't do much (which is a good thing) besides >> layout. If you're correctly using CSS, the markup isn't even responsible for >> the look (and feel). >> >> I don't know if this qualifies it as a 'V' in MVC. >> >> Sven >> >> James Carman schrieb: >> >> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Eelco Hillenius >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I've been thinking about the way in which wicket is an MVC framework and >>>>> whether people use it according to the MVC pattern. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The MVC pattern is bastardized - especially when it comes to web >>>> application frameworks - up to the point that it is hardly useful to >>>> use the term. Everyone seems to have their own interpretation. >>>> >>>> If you had to explain Wicket in MVC terms, my take would be that >>>> components represent the Controller and View (together, just like >>>> Swing), and the model is separated behind the IModel interface. But I >>>> think it is better to just let the whole MVC mania behind us and >>>> explain frameworks on their own terms :-) >>>> >>>> >>> >>> You could argue that the "view" is the markup file and the >>> "controller" is the component/page class? >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
