hehe on the watir point, I wonder if windows are finally loosing the
battle(not wanting to start a religious war though):)
btw an a thing that you could you if interested are to use jmeter in
conjunction with selenium. Eg you always have your selenium test which
runs.. And then when you decide nows a good time to load test, tell
firefox to go through the http jmeter proxy. And now you have a way to
load test with jmeter (if it makes sense to load/stress the functional
tests)...
regards Nino
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I just confirmed that watir sucks: it is IE/Windows only. This makes
it unsuitable to use it inside my company where we value running build
servers on linux. I'm working on OS X which makes building tests a
disaster (not to mention that the damned safari port won't build on my
mac).
Martijn
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I'm trying to discover which functional testing tool suits Wicket
development best. My options are:
- Canoo webtest
- Selenium
- Watir
I'd like some folks to create a couple of functional tests for our
wicket examples in one of these tools so that we get a complete
overview of all three testing platforms.
I've created one test for Canoo webtest, and I like the output of the
tool. The XML stuff is not that great though. Fortunately it also
supports groovy scripts. I intend to create some more tests and hope
that someone will be able to translate those tests to selenium and
watir so that we can compare these tools.
Anyone interested?
Martijn
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
