Thanks, Johan. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough about the motivation. On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why should the propertymodel be an inherited?
Well, to have model sharing. So why not just use a CPM? Because it has another difference to PM: you don't give the property expression explicitly, but the component name is used. When you don't want that (keep your HTML independent of your Java), or can't do that (reusable panels), you can't use CPM. So, what I'd like is a CompoundPropertyModel(Object, String) that works like in PM: "Construct with a wrapped (IModel) or unwrapped (non-IModel) object and a property expression that works on the given model.". I feel like I'm missing something basic here, sorry - perhaps you can enlighten me why this wouldn't make sense. Cheers, Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
