Sorry, not really. *) JSF doesn't consume less Memory over Wicket. But this is not really an Argument since Hardware isn't that expensive today. *) Maybe the availability of Millions of extension Libraries for JSF. *) EL Tags are quite useful, but IMHO just another way to do the same thing.
Regards, Timm Am Donnerstag, 7. August 2008 08:44:22 schrieb nlif: > Thanks Timm. This is valuable feedback. Nevertheless - can you point to any > advantage JSF has over Wicket? Anything at all? > > Thanks > > Timm Helbig wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I did one Project with JSF and two with Wicket. > > > > By far Wicket is much easier to handle, (nearly) everything works as > > supposed, > > which is not true for JSF, especially when it comes to external Libraries > > like Trinidad or other UI Extension Libraries. > > > > One other thing which is important for me is the Productivity. And this > > is > > much higher with Wicket than with JSF. > > > > The Community support is suberb with Wicket, and somewhat difficult when > > you > > check the JSF Forums, but this depends on the Manufactor of the Library > > you > > use. > > > > I don't want to slash JSF here, but I find it is miles away from a usable > > Product. For me it looks more like a prototype of what could be possible. > > Just check what happened from 1.1 to 1.2, and you see, that even Sun > > seemed > > to face this. > > > > Regards, > > Timm > > > > Am Mittwoch, 6. August 2008 11:13:53 schrieb nlif: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> We are in the process of selecting a web-framework, and although I am in > >> favor of Wicket, I was asked to provide an objective comparison of > >> Wicket with JSF. I have developed a few small apps in Wicket, but I > >> admit I am not > >> very familiar with JSF. Prior to posting here, I googled a bit, and > >> found a > >> few forum-threads and blog posts on this topic, but most are from 1-2 > >> years > >> ago and in framework years, this may be considered obsolete. > >> > >> Although this is the Wicket forum, I expect there are people here who > >> also > >> used (or at least evaluated) JSF at some point, so I'd be happy if folks > >> here could share their experience. If anyone can point me to useful > >> links that would be great too. > >> > >> I really am not trying to provoke a flame war, just to gather > >> information. > >> > >> In your opinion, what are Wicket strengths? What are JSF's ? (even if > >> you're a Wicket fan, surely there's something ;) > >> > >> I would be interested to hear people thoughts regarding the fact the JSF > >> is > >> a standard, while Wicket is not. How important is that to you? In what > >> ways > >> do you think this matters (if at all)? > >> > >> Also, supposedly JSF has a larger selection of 3rd party components > >> compared to Wicket. Is this true? how often do you find yourself rolling > >> your own components and how hard is it to do so in Wicket (and I mean > >> non-trivial-good-looking-Ajax-enabled stuff). > >> > >> Many thanks in advance. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
