Hello Matej, > I'd really be interested in how exactly did you come to > conclusion that DiskPageStore writing to disk is the > bottleneck. Unless your filesystem caching is broken :)
Hmmm, don't think the filesystem cache is broken. I am working with filesystem caches and lucene a lot and don't experience really bad performance. Through when profiling our wicket application with yourkit, I happened to see a lot of cpu being absorbed in the serialisation / deserialisation to filesytem Regards Ard > Serialization takes a significant part of request processing, > but that is necessary. > > -Matej > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Ard Schrijvers > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > Did anybody perhaps ever implement a memory version of the > > AbstractPageStore. Currently, I only see a DiskPageStore, which > > happens to be quite a large cpu bottleneck for Windows users AFAICS. > > > > So, before starting to implement one, just wondering > whether somebody > > has experience on a memory page store version, > > > > Thx for any pointers, > > > > Regards Ard > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.onehippo.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Amsterdam - Hippo B.V. Oosteinde 11 1017 WT Amsterdam > +31(0)20-5224466 > > San Francisco - Hippo USA Inc. 101 H Street, suite Q Petaluma CA > > 94952-3329 +1 (707) 773-4646 > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
