but serialization and writing to disk are 2 different things.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Ard Schrijvers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hello Igor and Timo, > > Sorry for my really way to late response, I was caught up entirely by > some stressful tasks which needed to be finished. > > I currently do not have statistics, but I could have a cpu yourkit > snapshot. I have seen up to 75% cpu in the serialization and > deserialization. Recently I saw 25%. > > People working with Linux do not experience this cpu bottleneck though, > so it might very well be an issue with how windows handles the > filesystem. I will sort out the suggestion by Timo, would be great if > that solved the issue. > > Thanks a lot, and again, sorry for my late response! > > -Ard > > > > > On Fri, 03 Oct 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > > > do you have some statistics for us? or some profiler timing > > screenshots? > > > > While waiting for the reply from Ard... I remember hearing of > > a case where the pagemaps were stored to a directory that the > > virus scanner was monitoring, and the scanner hogged all cpu > > during load testing :) I suppose that this kind of stuff > > happens more easily on Windows than on unices. > > > > Best wishes, > > Timo > > > > -- > > Timo Rantalaiho > > Reaktor Innovations Oy <URL: http://www.ri.fi/ > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
