Would it help using Bookmarkable links? ** Martin
2008/11/21 Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ralf Siemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks for the advice. Unfortunately we cannot do this here, because the >> ListViews contain Link components for user interaction. > > you can generate a link yourself easily, let your custom listview > implement ILinkListener and call urlfor(ILinkListener.INTERFACE) on > the component which will generate the url. than append the id to it > and you are done. > >>This worked, but unfortunately the links did not work >> anymore, because there were no link components on the page left ... > > ^ and now you know why the items are kept :) > > >> >> Ralf. >> >> >> Igor Vaynberg wrote: >> >>> if you are planning on displaying 1000 rows per page, which is quiet >>> uncommon for webapps, you should produce output as raw html instead of >>> using listview and adding components inside. >>> >>> -igor >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Ralf Siemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> we have recently launched our new Wicket-based website, and now we are >>>> experiencing that the memory consumption of the website is very high, so >>>> that it crashes the site regularly. >>>> >>>> When profiling the application server, we found out that there are HTTP >>>> sessions that consume up to 2 MB of memory, mostly because there are very >>>> large ListViews with up to 1000 entries, where each entry consumes about >>>> 2 >>>> KB. >>>> >>>> Our preliminary solution is to limit the size of those ListViews to a >>>> maximum of 50 entries, but even in those cases the session size is still >>>> at >>>> about 200 KB, which seems quite large to us. >>>> >>>> I know that there have already been some discussions about memory >>>> consumption in Wicket due to the fact that the whole Page object of the >>>> last >>>> visited page is stored in the session; but what I'd like to know is: Have >>>> you experienced session sizes in a comparable magnitude, or are we doing >>>> something wrong? Or is this something we have to live with when using >>>> Wicket? >>>> >>>> We are using Wicket 1.3.5. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Ralf. >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
