if you are planning on displaying 1000 rows per page, which is quiet uncommon for webapps, you should produce output as raw html instead of using listview and adding components inside.
-igor On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:15 AM, Ralf Siemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > we have recently launched our new Wicket-based website, and now we are > experiencing that the memory consumption of the website is very high, so > that it crashes the site regularly. > > When profiling the application server, we found out that there are HTTP > sessions that consume up to 2 MB of memory, mostly because there are very > large ListViews with up to 1000 entries, where each entry consumes about 2 > KB. > > Our preliminary solution is to limit the size of those ListViews to a > maximum of 50 entries, but even in those cases the session size is still at > about 200 KB, which seems quite large to us. > > I know that there have already been some discussions about memory > consumption in Wicket due to the fact that the whole Page object of the last > visited page is stored in the session; but what I'd like to know is: Have > you experienced session sizes in a comparable magnitude, or are we doing > something wrong? Or is this something we have to live with when using > Wicket? > > We are using Wicket 1.3.5. > > > Thanks, > > Ralf. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
