Timo, James et al, Yes I agree, that's better.
Core devs, Is there a reason why the Wicket archetype doesn't add the appropriate namespace in HomePage.html? Do you want a Jira issue raised for this? Regards - Cemal http://www.jWeekend.co.uk jWeekend Timo Rantalaiho wrote: > > On Mon, 02 Feb 2009, jWeekend wrote: >> We've been using: >> xmlns:wicket="http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket/wicket-xhtml1-strict.dtd";. > > Nowadays there's also > > http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.3-strict.dtd > > http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd > > Best wishes, > Timo > > -- > Timo Rantalaiho > Reaktor Innovations Oy <URL: http://www.ri.fi/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/What-is-the-best-way-to-handle-%22Undefined-attribute-name-%28wicket%3Aid%29%22--warnings-from-Eclipse-Ganymede--tp21788889p21807362.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
