You'd need to make sure the DTD matches what version of Wicket they chose, wouldn't you?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:33 PM, jWeekend <[email protected]> wrote: > > Timo, > > It's very simple change to the archetype: > just replace the html open tag > > with > > html > xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.3-strict.dtd"; > > in \archetype-resources\src\main\java\HomePage.html > > The question is, is there any reason why we wouldn't want to do this? > I've raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2074 the Jira > issue anyway. > > Regards - Cemal > http://www.jWeekend.co.uk jWeekend > > > > Timo Rantalaiho wrote: >> >> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009, jWeekend wrote: >>> Is there a reason why the Wicket archetype doesn't add the appropriate >>> namespace in HomePage.html? Do you want a Jira issue raised for this? >> >> Yep, preferably with a patch and/or instructions of how >> exactly it should be -- I for one don't know much about this >> XML stuff :) >> >> Cheers, >> Timo >> >> -- >> Timo Rantalaiho >> Reaktor Innovations Oy <URL: http://www.ri.fi/ > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/What-is-the-best-way-to-handle-%22Undefined-attribute-name-%28wicket%3Aid%29%22--warnings-from-Eclipse-Ganymede--tp21788889p21820419.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
