again thx to all the people so helpful on this mailing list!! this fact was an important argument to convince my customer to take wicket into account!
i migrated a little part of our old struts1 app to both seam/jsf and seam/wicket to compare the performance degradation when going from naked struts to a component oriented framework; jsf managed to serve 20 pages per second, wicket was the clear winner with 100 pages / second! see my comment on http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2009/01/14/seam-jsf-vs-wicket-performance-comparison/#comment-13386 wicket is really great in providing high level web development without sacrificing performance!! cheers, uwe! On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:04 PM, dtoffe <dto...@yahoo.com.ar> wrote: > > For 1) I suggest you to take a look at Wicket Web Beans: > > http://wicketwebbeans.sourceforge.net/ > > Cheers, > > Daniel > > > > janneru wrote: > > > > martin & john, > > > > thank you very much for your ideas! > > this helps me very much to make the next steps, i will post the results > > when > > the integration is done! > > > > bestregards, uwe! > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/migration-from-jsf-to-wicket-tp21724080p21733565.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
