On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 09:31 -0700, Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > Just to be complete, even if this is not really an option for us: with > > ONE_PASS_RENDER clustering with wicket would be fine, no further state > > management issues, right? > > Right. And there is back button support (access to older pages/ > previous renderings) to consider, I asume you are referring to the PageMap storing versioned pages...
> which without session affinity > you'll have to distribute throughout your cluster (though you might > want to do that anyway to support fall over). Right now we plan to run Wicket without a PageMap (or 0 versioned pages), REDIRECT_TO_RENDER and only LoadableDetachableModel with all required information in the URL. Do you think there are problems with this approach? Would you say REDIRECT_TO_RENDER has other disadvantages besides fetching entities twice? Cheers, Martin > > Eelco > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
