> What is the use of being able to attach a form to a <table>? There is > absolutely NONE.
Not necessary TABLE but it is very useful to replace with, for example TR. ** Martin > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Martin Makundi > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I wonder if (nested) forms should simply be allowed to have any tag >>>> name the programmer desires? >>> >>> No. Because 99% of the time the programmer is not aware that the form >>> is used in a nested fashion: the form usually is on a Panel, that is >>> used inside another form. The panel is standalone and should use form >>> tags. >> >> Yes, but there is no harm done if it is ALLOWED to have another tag >> name. If the user uses <form there is no harm done and the backward >> compatibility would take care of replacing <form> with <div>. >> >> ** >> Martin >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
