Think of the children! :) When your children grow up and become programmers and take over your code, they open it and see <tr action="/foo"> - is that very clear?
Wicket should enforce a form being rendered only with a form tag - that makes sense. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Martin Makundi < [email protected]> wrote: > > What is the use of being able to attach a form to a <table>? There is > > absolutely NONE. > > Not necessary TABLE but it is very useful to replace with, for example TR. > > ** > Martin > > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Martin Makundi > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> I wonder if (nested) forms should simply be allowed to have any tag > >>>> name the programmer desires? > >>> > >>> No. Because 99% of the time the programmer is not aware that the form > >>> is used in a nested fashion: the form usually is on a Panel, that is > >>> used inside another form. The panel is standalone and should use form > >>> tags. > >> > >> Yes, but there is no harm done if it is ALLOWED to have another tag > >> name. If the user uses <form there is no harm done and the backward > >> compatibility would take care of replacing <form> with <div>. > >> > >> ** > >> Martin > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > > Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
