thank thijs, I'll take that into account.
tonio On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Thijs <[email protected]> wrote: > Take into account that you might be able to use the jquery that is already > inside Liferay. > So if you want to use jquery from wicketstuff you'll probably have to > modify those components a bit. > > > > On 24-4-2009 18:45, Tonio Caputo wrote: > >> Thanks Rob for taking care, >> >> I was just using the DatePicker that comes with wicket-extensions, I still >> need to get into wicket to see what to use >> and what not to, as I've told just my first steps guided by Wicket In >> Action. >> >> But it seems jquery and wicket is a very common couple I've seen looking >> at >> the e-mails, so probably begin >> looking how to integrate them. >> >> Thanks again >> tonio >> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Rob Sonke<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Nice to hear that everything seems to work now. About the datepicker, >>> which >>> one is that? Because I'm using one from the wicketstuff projects ( >>> http://www.dynarch.com/static/jscalendar-1.0/index.html) and that one is >>> working fine. But we're about to migrate to a jquery based one. >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> >>> On 4/23/09 5:28 AM, Tonio Caputo wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> After trying a lot I finally was able to show and work (more or less). >>>> >>>> A warning: Never call your appl/portlet-name with the same name >>>> as the url-mapping, if not it won't work that was the main problem. >>>> >>>> My new problem I'm using DatePicker from wicket-extensions/wicket-date >>>> in a form, the date picker is not working (I mean the button that shows >>>> the >>>> calendar >>>> and let you choose a date in a friendly way) >>>> >>>> Not found something useful in mailing-lists so >>>> I added supports mime-type: text/javascript and application/x-javascript >>>> to >>>> portlet.xml, but still not working. >>>> >>>> Any idea of what is happening, or a solution to this problem >>>> >>>> Thanks very much in advance >>>> tonio >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Rob Sonke<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> We're running wicket 1.4m2 on liferay 5.2.x and that's working fine. We >>>>> only use the sun portlet container instead of the one from Liferay. >>>>> Search >>>>> the mailinglist and the liferay forum for the steps which you'll have >>>>> to >>>>> perform. >>>>> >>>>> Rob >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 4/21/09 4:45 AM, Tonio Caputo wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I've tried with liferay 5.2.2 tomcat6/tomcat55/jetty6.1.14, and no >>>>>> success. >>>>>> >>>>>> In both tomcat, application is deployed, but when put into a page, the >>>>>> application >>>>>> is not shown. >>>>>> >>>>>> In jetty, the application doesn't get deployed. >>>>>> >>>>>> In all cases there is no log, or any message that let me know what is >>>>>> happening. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any help will be greatly welcome >>>>>> Wicket is really a nice framework (the nicer I've seen), and it would >>>>>> be >>>>>> wonderful if I can use it instead JSP framework provided by liferay. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>>> tonio >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Tonio Caputo<[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi wicket users, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm a newbie in wicket and portlets, I'm involved in trying to find a >>>>>>> web framework to create portlets in a liferay portal, my duty is to >>>>>>> try wicket and see if it works. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Versions wicket 1-4-rc2 >>>>>>> liferay 5.2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> After reading Issue >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1620 >>>>>>> , >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> seems clear >>>>>>> that this is possible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Reading wicket portlet examples, I realized there is a lot of stuff >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> WicketPortlet, that >>>>>>> is a bit difficult to understand for a newbie for both things >>>>>>> (wicket/portlet). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll just like to know, if this is the correct example after >>>>>>> WICKET-1620, >>>>>>> or perhaps there >>>>>>> is a simpler one. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>>>> tonio >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
