Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what.... i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work around thanks Joe
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>wrote: > class mysession extends websesison { > private map<string, map<object,object>> coversations; > > public map<object,object> getconversation(ipagemap pmap) { > return conversations.get(pmap.getid()); > } > } > > -igor > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy<joewic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in wicket > > i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o from > page > > A -> page B > > But if Object o in page A which -> page B -> page C -> page D -> page E > > and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o all > > throught the way from A ----> ..E > > also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of pages > > ,this will be a nightmare > > > > so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store these > > objects there > > > > i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it > represent > > an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous mail ,i > > 've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot provide my > own > > factory for one > > > > so, any ideas about the conversation scope? > > what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable? > > can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like > > IPageMapFactory? > > > > thanks > > Joe > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >