Hican this functionality added to the standard wicket?
actually much of seam popularity came from supporting conversation scope...,
so i think that adding explicit wicket support will have momentum
i think that having just a store for conversation objects will be a good
begin
then we may add apis like beginConversation, endConversation
,joinConversation,mergeConversation ,suspendConversation,resumeConversation
and other concepts like workspace
what do u think?
Joe
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> only time will tell
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Joe Fawzy<joewic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > thanks dearwill wicket continue to support pageMap beyond 1.4 or it is
> now a
> > deprecated feature?
> > thanks
> > Joe
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> if the scope of your conversation is a browser window then its the best
> >> choice.
> >>
> >> -igor
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Fawzy<joewic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
> >> > But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what....
> >> > i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work
> around
> >> > thanks
> >> > Joe
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
> igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> class mysession extends websesison {
> >> >> private map<string, map<object,object>> coversations;
> >> >>
> >> >> public map<object,object> getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
> >> >> return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
> >> >> }
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> -igor
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy<joewic...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in
> >> wicket
> >> >> > i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o
> from
> >> >> page
> >> >> > A -> page B
> >> >> > But if Object o in page A which -> page B -> page C -> page D ->
> page
> >> E
> >> >> > and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o
> all
> >> >> > throught the way from A ----> ..E
> >> >> > also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of
> >> pages
> >> >> > ,this will be a nightmare
> >> >> >
> >> >> > so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store
> >> these
> >> >> > objects there
> >> >> >
> >> >> > i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it
> >> >> represent
> >> >> > an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous
> mail
> >> ,i
> >> >> > 've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot
> provide
> >> my
> >> >> own
> >> >> > factory for one
> >> >> >
> >> >> > so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
> >> >> > what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
> >> >> > can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
> >> >> > IPageMapFactory?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > thanks
> >> >> > Joe
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
