I always thought God used only in LISP :)
Nicolas Melendez wrote: > > god used Eclipse 1.0 to develop universe. > > NM > Software Developer - Buenos aires, Argentina. > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Martijn Reuvers > <martijn.reuv...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> You might want to try Netbeans for UML (there is a single plugin, >> install it and it works fine). I have not had any problems with it, it >> has quite some features (similar to the ones in JDeveloper). >> >> Use SQLDeveloper (of Oracle as well) if you need to replace Toad, >> however keep in mind it does not have all the dba features Toad >> provides, no free tool has these in fact. >> >> Well Apex is Apex, it cannot be replaced easily as its tied so closely >> to the oracle database and its pl/sql. >> >> As soon as you use Maven there is no need anymore for JDeveloper, at >> least not for running/building the project. If you really require >> specific features for instance for Apex you can still create a single >> workspace next to the normal maven one and use that separately. >> >> As for weblogic, just deploy a war manually through its console if you >> need to test it. However for faster testing I'd use Jetty with mvn >> jetty:run (you can always add a weblogic*.xml to the final war to >> override some libraries or so). >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Dane Laverty<danelave...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I've really enjoyed getting to use Maven on my recent projects. I'm no >> > Maven expert, but I'm finding that I don't have to be -- it really >> > just does a great job. Getting Maven working with JDeveloper has not >> > been going well so far, so that's been one hangup. >> > >> > There are a few reasons for the department-wide IDE mandate. Our >> > manager has just discovered UML (I don't know anything about it, to be >> > honest), and JDeveloper provides UML functionality out of the box, >> > while any of the free Eclipse UML plugins I could find required a >> > mountain of dependencies and don't appear to work as smoothly as the >> > JDev one. Also, we're trying to replace TOAD as our database tool, and >> > JDev looks like it can do that. The third reason is that most of our >> > applications are Oracle ApEx, and JDev has stuff for that too. >> > >> > I'm trying to port my existing apps to JDeveloper, but without much >> > success. The main problems so far are: >> > - How do I import a Wicket project using the Maven standard directory >> > layout? (I am aware of the Maven JDev plugin for JDev 10, but it has >> > issues with JDev 11) >> > - How do I run a Wicket app in JDeveloper using the internal WebLogic >> server? >> > - Does JDeveloper have some sort of Maven-like functionality for >> > project lifecycle management? >> > >> > I imagine (hope) that most of these questions have easy answers, but >> > I'm just not finding a lot of relevant online >> > documentation/discussion. Most of the JDeveloper web app documentation >> > is focused on EJBs or basic Servlet/JSP-based apps. >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:53 AM, James >> > Carman<jcar...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: >> >> +1 on using Maven. Most folks at our job site use eclipse, but I'm an >> >> IntelliJ junkie (they got me hooked many years ago and I can't break >> >> free). For the most part, we don't have issues between environments, >> >> provided folks have their plugins set up correctly. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Martijn Reuvers >> >> <martijn.reuv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> When you use ADF, then stick to JDeveloper you'll get a lot of >> >>> integration for your application and can really build applications >> >>> fast. >> >>> >> >>> However if you use open-source frameworks like wicket, you're better >> >>> off using one of the other IDE's (Netbeans, Eclipse, IntelliJ). Just >> >>> use maven or so, then your management has nothing to say, as it does >> >>> not really matter what IDE you use. I always say: Use whatever gets >> >>> the job done. =) >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Dane Laverty<danelave...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> > Our management has chosen to make JDeveloper 11g the required IDE >> for >> >>> > the department. Searching the Wicket mailing list archives, I find >> >>> > that there is very little discussion about JDev. I'd be interested >> to >> >>> > know, are any of you currently using JDeveloper as your main Wicket >> >>> > IDE? >> >>> > >> >>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JDeveloper---Can-I-get-a-show-of-hands--tp24102626p24119114.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
