Good info, thanks Igor, I'll check it out. J On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Igor Vaynberg<igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: > it is on component level. abstractlink has those methods i believe. > > -igor > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:16 AM, John Armstrong<siber...@siberian.org> wrote: >> Any plans to move this down to the Component level? I've had >> situations where I needed to override this at the page level and even >> within a panel within a page.. >> >> John- >> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Iain >> Reddick<iain.redd...@beatsystems.com> wrote: >>> You can actually configure the tags that are put around a disabled link at >>> application level, like this: >>> >>> getMarkupSettings().setDefaultBeforeDisabledLink( "" ); >>> getMarkupSettings().setDefaultAfterDisabledLink( "" ); >>> >>> This would give <span>*linktext*</span> for disabled lnks (such as an >>> autolink to the current page). >>> >>> Matthias Keller wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I'm creating a new website with wicket which should have a normal >>>> navigation bar. I'd like to be able to detect whether a link points to the >>>> current page to give the surrounding <div> a special class. >>>> For example on page1: >>>> <div class="activeLink"> >>>> <a href="page1">page1</a> >>>> </div> >>>> <div> >>>> <a href="page2">page2</a> >>>> </div> >>>> >>>> I thought about autolinking which does that automatically, except it adds >>>> very ugly <span><em> tags. I also don't want to change this globally just >>>> to >>>> have a nicer navigation autolinking going. In addition this would be tricky >>>> as I need the <div>s around the links, but with different CSS classes. >>>> >>>> I'm thinking about creating a panel (representing the <div> with the link) >>>> which then adds the link and which has to be created by giving the current >>>> page via the constructor in order for it to find out if the link represents >>>> the current page. But this seems to be very complicated so I think there >>>> must be a more elegant solution for that, as this requirement surely isn't >>>> anything new....?! >>>> >>>> Thanks for your hints >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
