i dont think anyone on the wicket team is "biased" against ejb or jpa. what we are "biased" against are people who believe that just because something is a standard it is inherently good.
-igor On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:30 PM, <b...@actrix.gen.nz> wrote: > Peter, > > If you already used Hibernate, then you probalbly don't want to deal > with raw JDBC anymore. JPA is the new standard, and even Hibernate is > compatible with it. I use NetBeans + EJB 3.0 including JPA + Wicket > which looks like an easy combination to me. On that level, if your > persistence technology is not performing, then you can replace it with > something else easily, e.g. OpenJPA, EclipseLink. > > I get the impression that out of a number of persistence frameworks > some will become legacy over time while JPA becomes mainstream. I have > read comments that due to the emergence of JPA, iBatis support has > shifted efforts away from Java, towards MS .NET. > > I would not be distracted by any impression that part of the Wicket > community may be biased against EJB and JPA. > > Please refer to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2416 > > Regards > > Bernard > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:34:55 +0000 (GMT), you wrote: > >>What's the fast and easy way? >> >>I am asking because of a lot of trouble with hibernate. >> >> >> >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
