I think the problem is that you are using the "volatile" keyword when you
should be using "transient".

bht wrote:
> So I wonder, what is the situation with SerializableChecker
> complaining about that volatile field not being Serializable. Is this
> a bug or do I miss anything?

View this message in context: 
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to