Also -1 on bringing it into core. I don't feel it has wide enough adoption to justify it being maintained by core committers. There's too many security options out there.
-- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>wrote: > -1 on bringing this into the core. its more code to maintain and we > are busy enough already making improvements to the core itself. > > -igor > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Martijn Dashorst > <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Guys, > > > > I'd like to discuss the future of the Wicket Security project. > > Currently the project lives on/in the wicketstuff repository, but uses > > group id and package names "org.apache.wicket". IMO We should either: > > > > - adopt Wicket Security into the Wicket project and move everything > > over from Wicket Stuff into a subproject within Apache Wicket (and > > adopt the committers), or > > - keep Wicket Security at wicketstuff and move it into the fold of > > wicket stuff, including groupid/package rename. > > > > Since development on wicket security 1.4 is currently happening with a > > 1.4-beta1 just released, it is prudent to decide its future now (with > > a pending package rename). > > > > Considering that both the wicket security contributors and the Wicket > > PMC members are needed to make this happen, all their opinions are > > considered binding. > > > > [ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket > > [ ] keep Wicket security at Wicket Stuff > > > > Martijn > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
