On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Emond Papegaaij <emond.papega...@topicus.nl> wrote: > That sounds a bit overkill to me. I don't think anyone will ever want to use > SWARM in a non-Wicket application. Naturally, this is a bit different for > Shiro and spring-security, because these are existing projects (if I'm not > mistaken), which can also be used without Wicket.
Overkill? It's not overkill to provide a framework where you can plug in providers. I didn't say that SWARM should be used outside of Wicket (I personally wouldn't use it anywhere because I think it's too complicated). What I was saying was that any security "framework" for Wicket should allow you to bring your own security provider (shiro, spring-security, etc). That's exactly what the wicket-security code provides right now with the AuthenticatedWebApplication, AuthenticatedWebSession, etc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
