Hi Richard, Your ideas seam very interesting.. I haven't had alot of time to work on the project and am currently the only developer as the initial team isn't responding. I will checkout your patch, and would love to continue discussing changes with you.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Richard Wilkinson < richardjohnwilkin...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi again, > > Attached is a patch (zipped) to be applied to the push directory > inside the push-parent directory under svn [1]. Any feedback or > comments would be welcome. > > [1] - > https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/push-parent > > - > Regards - Richard Wilkinson > Developer, > jWeekend: OO & Java Technologies - Development and Training > http://jWeekend.com > > On 8 March 2010 14:37, Richard Wilkinson > <richardjohnwilkin...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have been working on the wicketstuff-push project offline; so far > > we have modified the code to run using jQuery (using wiQuery [1]) with > > the latest version of the cometd javascript, and fixed a few bugs / > > made some improvements. For example the current code wasn't as > > efficient as it could have been when you subscribe to more than one > > event per page. We also have added a 'push model', where when you > > update the contents of a components model, that component is updated > > as usual with wicket ajax, and some helper code for working with > > wiQuery. > > > > All of this code is work-in-progress, but we want to start a dialog > > with the main developer(s) of the push project to see if we can > > contribute our work back to the community. > > > > We also experimented with using atmosphere [2] which allows cometd to > > work on more servlet containers than just jetty, but while the > > integration worked fine, there is currently a bug in the atmosphere > > code which means that it doesn't work with the current version of the > > cometd servlet [3]. > > > > A version based only on wicket ajax sounds interesting, if you look at > > the jQuery binding, most of the actual work is done by the > > framework-agnostic cometd.js file, with jQuery providing the ajax > > mechanism and the JSON evaluation, however I know that the wicket ajax > > backend is being re-written in 1.5, so any work done on the 1.4 branch > > would be relatively short lived. > > > > I will try and get together a patch with our work in it for the push > > project and post it here, or I could maybe branch the main push-parent > > in the wicketstuff svn. > > > > [1] - http://code.google.com/p/wiquery/ > > [2] - https://atmosphere.dev.java.net/ > > [3] - http://n2.nabble.com/Bayuex-problems-tt4633855.html > > > > -- > > Regards - Richard Wilkinson > > Developer, > > jWeekend: OO & Java Technologies - Development and Training > > http://jWeekend.com > > > > On 8 March 2010 13:36, Martin U <ufer.mar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Folks, > >> > >> i need some COMETD or something equal implemention in my > web-application. So > >> i found wickestuff-push. But as far as is see, it users dojo to do the > >> client-side magic. > >> > >> I dont want to blow up my application more as it still is ;) so i want > ask > >> for an wicket + comet workaround with jQuery or with wicket-own > javascript > >> functionality. > >> > >> > >> thanks in advance for any hint. > >> > >> > >> - Martin > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Rodolfo Hansen CTO, KindleIT Software Development Email: rhan...@kindleit.net Mobile: +1 (809) 860-6669
