Wow thanks for your contribution. Iam not very used to use Patches on SVN-Directories. But i'll try my best to understand how it works ;)
Iam looking for a possibility to run wicketstuff-push without a Jetty instance to. Prefered Tomcat... Thanks! richardjohnwilkinson wrote: > > Hi again, > > Attached is a patch (zipped) to be applied to the push directory > inside the push-parent directory under svn [1]. Any feedback or > comments would be welcome. > > [1] - > https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/push-parent > > - > Regards - Richard Wilkinson > Developer, > jWeekend: OO & Java Technologies - Development and Training > http://jWeekend.com > > On 8 March 2010 14:37, Richard Wilkinson > <richardjohnwilkin...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have been working on the wicketstuff-push project offline; so far >> we have modified the code to run using jQuery (using wiQuery [1]) with >> the latest version of the cometd javascript, and fixed a few bugs / >> made some improvements. For example the current code wasn't as >> efficient as it could have been when you subscribe to more than one >> event per page. We also have added a 'push model', where when you >> update the contents of a components model, that component is updated >> as usual with wicket ajax, and some helper code for working with >> wiQuery. >> >> All of this code is work-in-progress, but we want to start a dialog >> with the main developer(s) of the push project to see if we can >> contribute our work back to the community. >> >> We also experimented with using atmosphere [2] which allows cometd to >> work on more servlet containers than just jetty, but while the >> integration worked fine, there is currently a bug in the atmosphere >> code which means that it doesn't work with the current version of the >> cometd servlet [3]. >> >> A version based only on wicket ajax sounds interesting, if you look at >> the jQuery binding, most of the actual work is done by the >> framework-agnostic cometd.js file, with jQuery providing the ajax >> mechanism and the JSON evaluation, however I know that the wicket ajax >> backend is being re-written in 1.5, so any work done on the 1.4 branch >> would be relatively short lived. >> >> I will try and get together a patch with our work in it for the push >> project and post it here, or I could maybe branch the main push-parent >> in the wicketstuff svn. >> >> [1] - http://code.google.com/p/wiquery/ >> [2] - https://atmosphere.dev.java.net/ >> [3] - http://n2.nabble.com/Bayuex-problems-tt4633855.html >> >> -- >> Regards - Richard Wilkinson >> Developer, >> jWeekend: OO & Java Technologies - Development and Training >> http://jWeekend.com >> >> On 8 March 2010 13:36, Martin U <ufer.mar...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> i need some COMETD or something equal implemention in my >>> web-application. So >>> i found wickestuff-push. But as far as is see, it users dojo to do the >>> client-side magic. >>> >>> I dont want to blow up my application more as it still is ;) so i want >>> ask >>> for an wicket + comet workaround with jQuery or with wicket-own >>> javascript >>> functionality. >>> >>> >>> thanks in advance for any hint. >>> >>> >>> - Martin >>> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Wicketstuff-Push-without-Dojo--tp27821316p27832039.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
