On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Martin Grigorov <mcgreg...@e-card.bg> wrote: > Hi Martijn, > > I have two problems with your filter: > 1) The main problem is that our pages does not have XHTML doctype. > The pages are XML well formed but this is not enough. > I tried once to set this doctype and the browsers rendered them in a > very funny (and broken) way. The HTML and probably CSS will need some > work to make it XHTML complaint.
Probably you send out the document as mimetype application+xml which causes the browsers to revert to strict mode. See [1] for more information. You could use html 4.01 transitional instead as the doctype, or xhtml transitional. Our application uses this: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> <html xmlns:wicket> but sends out pages as: "Content-Type:text/html;charset=UTF-8" As for #2: we use scope provided as well. Martijn [1] http://diveintohtml5.org/past.html#mime-types --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
