i think this is fixed in 1.4.7+, you should upgrade

-igor

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Jimi <jimi.hulleg...@mogul.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, I managed to find the problem using the javascript debug function of
> Firebug, but I have no idea on how to solve it.
>
> The problematic code lies in the file wicket-date.js:
>
> 125  /**
> 126  * Return the result of interpolating the value (date) argument with the
> date pattern.
> 127  * The dateValue has to be an array, where year is in the first, month
> in the second
> 128  * and date (day of month) in the third slot.
> 129  */
> 130  Wicket.DateTime.substituteDate = function(datePattern, date) {
> 131  day = date[2];
> 132  month = date[1];
> 133  year = date[0];
> 134  // optionally do some padding to match the pattern
> 135  if(datePattern.match(/dd+/)) day =
> Wicket.DateTime.padDateFragment(day);
> 136  if(datePattern.match(/MM+/)) month =
> Wicket.DateTime.padDateFragment(month);
> 137  if(datePattern.match(/yy+/)) year =
> Wicket.DateTime.padDateFragment(year % 100);
> 138  // replace pattern with real values
> 139  return datePattern.replace(/d+/, day).replace(/M+/,
> month).replace(/y+/, year);
> 140  }
>
> On the line 137 it truncates the year from 2010 to 10, and simply ignores
> the fact that I want a 4 digit year.
>
> When I did the same debugging on the example on wicketstuff.org I found that
> this javascript function looked a little bit different:
>
> 80  Wicket.DateTime.substituteDate = function(datePattern, date) {
> 71  day = date[2];
> 72  month = date[1];
> 73  year = date[0];
> 74  if(datePattern.match(/dd+/)) day = Wicket.DateTime.padDateFragment(day);
> 75  if(datePattern.match(/MM+/)) month =
> Wicket.DateTime.padDateFragment(month);
> 76  if(datePattern.match(/byy+/)) year =
> Wicket.DateTime.padDateFragment(year % 100);
> 77  return datePattern.replace(/d+/, day).replace(/M+/, month).replace(/y+/,
> year);
> 78  }
>
> Here on line 76 it sees if the datePattern matches "byy+", I have no idea
> what that 'b' i supposed to mean, but the result is that it doesn't truncate
> the year from 4 to 2 digits.
>
> I also noted that these two *different* wicket-date.js files contain the
> exact same versioning information:
>
> YAHOO.register("wicket-date", Wicket.DateTime, {version: "1.3.0", build:
> "rc1"});
>
> So, does anyone know what I can do to get the correct wicket-date.js? Or
> should I report this as a bug somewhere? The way I see it, the javascript
> should check if the datepattern matches "yyyy" and then leave the year as it
> is.
>
> /Jimi
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Javascript-string-formatting-problem-with-DateTextField-and-DatePicker-tp2241433p2241559.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to