I made a mistake in my first post. The output of wasn't:

<div>
 <div class="product">.....</div>
 <div class="product">.....</div>
 <div class="product">.....</div>
 <div class="product">.....</div>
</div>

but it was:
<div class="product">.....</div>
<div class="product">.....</div>
<div class="product">.....</div>
<div class="product">.....</div>

So the outer div is missing.
Which is caused by item.setRenderBodyOnly(true). But if I disable (set to 
false) this (the default), I get:

<div class="products"><div class="product">.....</div></div>
<div class="products"><div class="product">.....</div></div>
<div class="products"><div class="product">.....</div></div>
<div class="products"><div class="product">.....</div></div>

which is even worse.

A solution (the only?) to this double div problem and at the same time the 
missing attribute problem, is using wicket:container tags. (see 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Panel-in-List-remove-extra-div-td1877053.html
 )
This leads to this solution:


<div class="products">
 <wicket:container wicket:id="products">
 <div class="product" wicket:id="productPanel">.....</div>
 </wicket:container>
</div>

Wicket:container tags make it ugly imo, because it violates wickts "just HTML" 
philosophy, even though my problem is a very common scenario.


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Fatih Mehmet UCAR
> Sent: 08/21/10 04:05 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: setRenderBodyOnly with ListView and attributes
>
> Add another html div with css class you want around the below list div ;
>
> <div class="products" wicket:id="productsView">
>
> and for the productsViev in the java code setRenderBodyOnly to true.
>
> -fmu
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "J" <bluecar...@gmx.com>
> To: <users@wicket.apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 2:49 PM
> Subject: Re: setRenderBodyOnly with ListView and attributes
>
>
> > It somehow feels bad/wrong to move CSS from WicketHTML to JavaCode, where 
> > it shouldn't belong, for such a common scenario.
> > It defeats the purpose of having HTML in Wicket. But there probably is no 
> > other way.
> >
> > Anyway, thanks for your reply :)
> >
> >
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>
> >> From: Fatih Mehmet UCAR
> >> Sent: 08/21/10 03:43 PM
> >> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: setRenderBodyOnly with ListView and attributes
> >>
> >> AttributeAppender class will help you to acheive that.
> >>
> >> -fmu
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "J" <bluecar...@gmx.com>
> >> To: <users@wicket.apache.org>
> >> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 2:24 PM
> >> Subject: setRenderBodyOnly with ListView and attributes
> >>
> >>
> >> > hi, I want to have Wicket to generate the following HTML precisely:
> >> >
> >> > <div class="products">
> >> > <div class="product">.....</div>
> >> > <div class="product">.....</div>
> >> > <div class="product">.....</div>
> >> > <div class="product">.....</div>
> >> > </div>
> >> >
> >> > But with my code, I don't get further than:
> >> >
> >> > <div>
> >> > <div class="product">.....</div>
> >> > <div class="product">.....</div>
> >> > <div class="product">.....</div>
> >> > <div class="product">.....</div>
> >> > </div>
> >> >
> >> > so the class attribute is missing in the outer div.
> >> >
> >> > My Wicket HTML is:
> >> > <div class="products" wicket:id="productsView">
> >> > <div class="product" wicket:id="productPanel">.....</div>
> >> > </div>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > My code:
> >> > ListView productsView = new ListView("productsView", products) {
> >> > protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
> >> > item.setRenderBodyOnly(true);
> >> > item.add(new ProductPanel("productPanel", item.getModelObject()));
> >> > }
> >> > };
> >> > add(productsView);
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > What is the Wicket way of achieving this?
> >> > (A solution is to use the wicket:container tag, but that's a bit ugly,
> >> > right?)
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > 
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to