send your html and java code, there may be other ways of doing this.
----- Original Message -----
From: "J" <bluecar...@gmx.com>
To: <users@wicket.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: setRenderBodyOnly with ListView and attributes
I made a mistake in my first post. The output of wasn't:
<div>
<div class="product">.....</div>
<div class="product">.....</div>
<div class="product">.....</div>
<div class="product">.....</div>
</div>
but it was:
<div class="product">.....</div>
<div class="product">.....</div>
<div class="product">.....</div>
<div class="product">.....</div>
So the outer div is missing.
Which is caused by item.setRenderBodyOnly(true). But if I disable (set to
false) this (the default), I get:
<div class="products"><div class="product">.....</div></div>
<div class="products"><div class="product">.....</div></div>
<div class="products"><div class="product">.....</div></div>
<div class="products"><div class="product">.....</div></div>
which is even worse.
A solution (the only?) to this double div problem and at the same time the
missing attribute problem, is using wicket:container tags. (see
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Panel-in-List-remove-extra-div-td1877053.html )
This leads to this solution:
<div class="products">
<wicket:container wicket:id="products">
<div class="product" wicket:id="productPanel">.....</div>
</wicket:container>
</div>
Wicket:container tags make it ugly imo, because it violates wickts "just
HTML" philosophy, even though my problem is a very common scenario.
----- Original Message -----
From: Fatih Mehmet UCAR
Sent: 08/21/10 04:05 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: setRenderBodyOnly with ListView and attributes
Add another html div with css class you want around the below list div ;
<div class="products" wicket:id="productsView">
and for the productsViev in the java code setRenderBodyOnly to true.
-fmu
----- Original Message -----
From: "J" <bluecar...@gmx.com>
To: <users@wicket.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: setRenderBodyOnly with ListView and attributes
> It somehow feels bad/wrong to move CSS from WicketHTML to JavaCode,
> where
> it shouldn't belong, for such a common scenario.
> It defeats the purpose of having HTML in Wicket. But there probably is
> no
> other way.
>
> Anyway, thanks for your reply :)
>
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> From: Fatih Mehmet UCAR
>> Sent: 08/21/10 03:43 PM
>> To: users@wicket.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: setRenderBodyOnly with ListView and attributes
>>
>> AttributeAppender class will help you to acheive that.
>>
>> -fmu
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "J" <bluecar...@gmx.com>
>> To: <users@wicket.apache.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 2:24 PM
>> Subject: setRenderBodyOnly with ListView and attributes
>>
>>
>> > hi, I want to have Wicket to generate the following HTML precisely:
>> >
>> > <div class="products">
>> > <div class="product">.....</div>
>> > <div class="product">.....</div>
>> > <div class="product">.....</div>
>> > <div class="product">.....</div>
>> > </div>
>> >
>> > But with my code, I don't get further than:
>> >
>> > <div>
>> > <div class="product">.....</div>
>> > <div class="product">.....</div>
>> > <div class="product">.....</div>
>> > <div class="product">.....</div>
>> > </div>
>> >
>> > so the class attribute is missing in the outer div.
>> >
>> > My Wicket HTML is:
>> > <div class="products" wicket:id="productsView">
>> > <div class="product" wicket:id="productPanel">.....</div>
>> > </div>
>> >
>> >
>> > My code:
>> > ListView productsView = new ListView("productsView", products) {
>> > protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
>> > item.setRenderBodyOnly(true);
>> > item.add(new ProductPanel("productPanel", item.getModelObject()));
>> > }
>> > };
>> > add(productsView);
>> >
>> >
>> > What is the Wicket way of achieving this?
>> > (A solution is to use the wicket:container tag, but that's a bit
>> > ugly,
>> > right?)
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
