And something like this?:

Creating form for user using wicket with validation. After submit creating a
page with
custom form which will automatically do submit?

Thanx,
pavol

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:00 AM, James Carman
<[email protected]>wrote:

> The problem with the first approach is that using Wicket would
> essentially buy you nothing in that case.  You couldn't use Wicket's
> validation.  Binding the input fields to models wouldn't buy you
> anything since the form isn't submitted to Wicket.  Also, the form
> fields would have to be set up manually so that the names all match up
> with what YouTube expects.  So, you'd be pretty much manually putting
> together the <input> elements in your markup file anyway.  Here, I
> don't see Wicket being a huge benefit to you (other than as perhaps a
> rendering engine?).  You'd be pretty much using static HTML with some
> JS hackery to do some validation.
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote:
> > See:
> >
> >
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Returning-XML-to-JS-tp1873294p1873298.html
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-and-youtube-browser-based-upload-tp3458767p3459719.html
> > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to