Are you referring to this conversation? http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-5-rc2-and-aggregate-jar-for-osgi-td3356667.html
If so, I read it and answered that I'm not interested in any solution that involves the uber-jar. I do not see any advantage in that solution over a normal war. I do not find any other advice from you and Eike, maybe you can point me out the right conversation. On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Daniele, > > Me and later Eike explained to you in the other thread you started few > months ago how to solve exactly this problem. > It seems you didn't read it at all. Please read again the part > mentioning Wicket 1.5 RC1. > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Daniele Dellafiore > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I did it. Yes, the tough way but I did it. > > Now the 1.5RC3 quickstart app just started on my karaf 2.2 with the > > 1.5-SNAPSHOT I built. > > > > Basically I renamed the .util and .request packages in -core bundle to be > > .core.util and .core.request. > > I had to make a class public in another package under -request bundle to > > make it visible, but it's a minor thing. > > > > I open a bug on jira now... wow, is down :) well, as soon as it get back > > online. > > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Daniele Dellafiore > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> it is not. > >> > >> I'm hacking on the trunk to make that work. > >> Maybe a quick solution is just change org.apache.wicket to > >> org.apache.wicket.core in the -core bundle. > >> > >> Of course there are some default scope classes that works through > different > >> packages but I can just make them public for now. > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:18 PM, James Carman < > [email protected]>wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Daniele Dellafiore < > [email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > I think that the wicket package layout should be changed now that > -util > >>> and > >>> > -request bundles have been detached from -core. > >>> > > >>> > >>> From an OSGi perspective, we should probably try to make sure that > >>> packages don't span jar files. Everything in > >>> org.apache,wicket.request should be in wicket-request.jar, for > >>> example. I don't know if that's the case, currently or not. > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
