It is the same conversation. You need uber-jar. At least one that combines -util, -request and -core. Everything else is optional, depending on your app needs.
Can you describe what is the problem to use the uber-jar? Or what are the benefits to deploy these three jars separately in the OSGi container ? On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Daniele Dellafiore <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you referring to this conversation? > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-5-rc2-and-aggregate-jar-for-osgi-td3356667.html > > If so, I read it and answered that I'm not interested in any solution that > involves the uber-jar. I do not see any advantage in that solution over a > normal war. > > I do not find any other advice from you and Eike, maybe you can point me out > the right conversation. > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Daniele, >> >> Me and later Eike explained to you in the other thread you started few >> months ago how to solve exactly this problem. >> It seems you didn't read it at all. Please read again the part >> mentioning Wicket 1.5 RC1. >> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Daniele Dellafiore >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I did it. Yes, the tough way but I did it. >> > Now the 1.5RC3 quickstart app just started on my karaf 2.2 with the >> > 1.5-SNAPSHOT I built. >> > >> > Basically I renamed the .util and .request packages in -core bundle to be >> > .core.util and .core.request. >> > I had to make a class public in another package under -request bundle to >> > make it visible, but it's a minor thing. >> > >> > I open a bug on jira now... wow, is down :) well, as soon as it get back >> > online. >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Daniele Dellafiore >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> it is not. >> >> >> >> I'm hacking on the trunk to make that work. >> >> Maybe a quick solution is just change org.apache.wicket to >> >> org.apache.wicket.core in the -core bundle. >> >> >> >> Of course there are some default scope classes that works through >> different >> >> packages but I can just make them public for now. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:18 PM, James Carman < >> [email protected]>wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Daniele Dellafiore < >> [email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > I think that the wicket package layout should be changed now that >> -util >> >>> and >> >>> > -request bundles have been detached from -core. >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> From an OSGi perspective, we should probably try to make sure that >> >>> packages don't span jar files. Everything in >> >>> org.apache,wicket.request should be in wicket-request.jar, for >> >>> example. I don't know if that's the case, currently or not. >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Martin Grigorov >> jWeekend >> Training, Consulting, Development >> http://jWeekend.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
