Hi, Yes, this CDATA is there to be able to use > and < with XHTML. You can construct the templates directly with renderString() method to avoid the CDATA.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Serban Balamaci <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > Our javascript developer complains that Wicket automatically adds the CDATA > part whenever it encounters the *script* tag. > He's trying to embed a template in the html file(not in the head section) > > > and he gets a bunch of CDATA along with the html which will get > multiplied(we're creating a breadcrumb component) > > > we're using underscore.js and the idea it's based on > http://ejohn.org/blog/javascript-micro-templating/ > > > I've said that the CDATA is there to pass the validation of the html, but he > says html5 is not xhtml and is much looser with validations. > > ----- > http://balamaci.wordpress.com > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Bypass-CDATA-contribution-on-script-tags-tp4176752p4176752.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
