If your ThreadLocal is needed within Wicket, shouldn't your filter run *before* WicketFilter?
Does your filter use any Wicket classes that require something in o.a.w.ThreadContext? The basic design should work. We use a filter to manage a ThreadLocal Hibernate Session for open-session-in-view. On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:38 PM, YK <linux_2...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to make example using wicket 1.5.4 and spring work but I keep > having this exception: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: There is > no > application attached to current thread... > > My example defines also a servlet filter that is applied just after the > WicketFilter in web.xml. > This filter uses ThreadLocal to set/unset a variable around each > request/response cycle. > > I've noticed that if I disable the filter, my example works fine, but I > really need it to to pass a variable via the ThreadLocal: (static final > ThreadLocal<Map<String, Serializable>> THREAD_OBJECT_CONTEXT = new > ThreadLocal<Map<String, Serializable>>();) > > > Any idea about why wicket fails to accept such a filter please? > > Is there a workaround please? > > > Thanks > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/org-apache-wicket-WicketRuntimeException-There-is-no-application-attached-to-current-thread-tp4447781p4447781.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
