Try with an ldm I'd say. On Mar 18, 2012 9:04 AM, "Bálint Kriván" <bal...@krivan.hu> wrote:
> I don't want to serialize them but wicket does (I have a list of objects > which I pass to a ListView). > IIRC, If I use LDM I can make wicket to serialize only an ID and when it is > readed back I can reach the backend to get the correct object for that ID. > If I would switch to this probably it would be more query than now, because > even the parent objects should be retrieved from the DB one-by-one. > It would be enough for me if I could make wicket not to try to serialize > these objects (these are retrieved in the constructor so I don't see the > need to save them on the first place) > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 1:56 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com > >wrote: > > > Use a LoadableDetachableModel. You shouldn't be serializing > > persistent objects (unless of course you're in the middle of editing > > them or something). > > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Bálint Kriván <bal...@krivan.hu> wrote: > > > Hey! > > > > > > It seems that when wicket is trying to serialize the persistent objects > > > (probably to session) the lazy loading kicks in and it retrieves the > > whole > > > graph. > > > Not sure if wicket is using the default java serialization or a special > > > one, but is there anybody else who is/were experiencing the same? By > any > > > chance would you have any suggestion how can I overcome this? > > > It would be a great solution if an association is persisted when it's > > > loaded, but if it isn't then do not lazy load it, just leave it null. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Bálint Kriván > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Üdv, > Kriván Bálint >
