It's a problem when users bookmark it. Because ...?5 this session is an entirely other page as ...?5 in another session tomorrow.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012, at 11:53, Girts Ziemelis wrote: > > > On 2012-03-19 02:46, Paolo wrote: > > I support you! I implemented class NoVersionMount thanks to pointbreak > > in my MainApplication. And It will be my template for future app. But > > to do it, I needed to understood the problem, check on google, read a > > lot of pages, without found a solution, so post the question here, and > > after 3 post, got a right reply for me. Why an wicket user have to do > > all this???? Why not, wicket use the NoVersionMount as default Mount? > > Like in wicket 1.4. And implement an VersionMount as an alternative > > for developer? > I actually like this change so far. I can finally tell, that my page is > stetefull just by looking at the link and ask myself question - if I > really care so much about the clean link for this page, may be it should > be stateless in a first place? > > And why is ?0 such a big problem? It does not cause problems sending > links. > Is there any real proof of google indexing problems so far? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
