Yes (sort of) except you don't need two users. Just bookmark a page with a version/id e.g. ?5, close the sessions, open a new session, do some interaction so that another version of the page with version/id ?5 exists, and use that bookmark. Stuff like that confuses users even if they don't care about "pretty" urls.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012, at 10:07, Martin Grigorov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > indeed. we should check that the page pointed to by the id maps back > > to the mount, and create a new instance based on the mount if it > > doesnt. jira please. > > This is already the case, no need of a ticket for this. If there is no > ?5 then Wicket creates ?0 and shows it. > > The "problem" Pointbreak actually mean is that userA may have opened > ?5 in his session, copy the url and give it to > userB, but userB also already have its own session and by chance he > also had reached ?5 and these two ?5s are > different because they may have different states for both users. > > The confusing part here is "bookmarkable". Now imagine that there is > no ?pageId in the url. userA clicks several Ajax links to get to > version5 of that page and then copy/paste the url but userB will see > the initial state of the page, not version5 that userA actually meant. > So it seems only ?0 is actually "bookmarkable" for stateful pages. > Only in this case both users will see the same content (if there is no > special logic for user permissions involved). > > If userA wants to fully share his page with userB then he has to share > his session too, i.e. both ?5 and jessionid= has to be in the pasted > url. I don't recomment this! > > ?5 helps when the user refreshes the page in his current session. In > this case he will see the same content as before the refresh. In 1.4 > he'd see the initial state of the page and will loose any state that > is not persisted so far. > > > > > > -igor > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Pointbreak > > <pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net> wrote: > >> It's a problem when users bookmark it. Because ...?5 this session is an > >> entirely other page as ...?5 in another session tomorrow. > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012, at 11:53, Girts Ziemelis wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2012-03-19 02:46, Paolo wrote: > >>> > I support you! I implemented class NoVersionMount thanks to pointbreak > >>> > in my MainApplication. And It will be my template for future app. But > >>> > to do it, I needed to understood the problem, check on google, read a > >>> > lot of pages, without found a solution, so post the question here, and > >>> > after 3 post, got a right reply for me. Why an wicket user have to do > >>> > all this???? Why not, wicket use the NoVersionMount as default Mount? > >>> > Like in wicket 1.4. And implement an VersionMount as an alternative > >>> > for developer? > >>> I actually like this change so far. I can finally tell, that my page is > >>> stetefull just by looking at the link and ask myself question - if I > >>> really care so much about the clean link for this page, may be it should > >>> be stateless in a first place? > >>> > >>> And why is ?0 such a big problem? It does not cause problems sending > >>> links. > >>> Is there any real proof of google indexing problems so far? > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
