> // Via generics Paul, I am not seeing this comment in the actual code. I am assuming that you added this comment to clarify something for me, but I am not getting it.
> Thus if you use generics your problem would most likely go away Are you saying that Wicket has a different code path for models defined as new Model(x) and new Model<SomeType>(x)? It's impossible because <SomeType> information is lost at runtime. > , otherwise you would have to suffer a bit and you should porb call setType() > so Wicket > would know what implementation of IConverter to use. Default type converters worked well in 1.4 and in 1.5 require setType() in some situations. How can I track down all the components in my code that require setType() 1.5? Thanks, Alec --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
