Ok, thanks for that summary. On another note: Is there a correct pronunciation of "l0rdn1kk0n"? If so, what is it? =]
>-----Original Message----- >From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, 22 October 2012 9:00 PM >To: users@wicket.apache.org >Subject: Re: Which Twitter Bootstrap to use? > >The core Wicket Bootstrap currently just provides the bootstrap >artifacts. And for the foreseeable future, I don't expect it to go >beyond that too much. > >I still am on the fence on: > > - whether a Bootstrap component library should be part of Wicket > - whether l0rdn1kk0n's implementation is the way to go > >If you need a component library now, you should really use >l0rdn1kk0n's implementation. Currently that project has the freedom to >move at a different pace than Wicket, so that is a benefit. If/whether >that ends up at Apache is unknown. > >At €-dayjob we are starting to develop Bootstrap applications and we >are experimenting with building our own component libraries. If they >end up looking like l0rdn1kk0n's bootstrap implementation, we'll >gladly move to that project, and start advocating its adoption as a >wicket core project, or start pointing folks at that particular >implementation. > >For now, Wicket's bootstrap is just there to support the new examples >and might be folded into them. I think the wicket examples are a >special case that usually don't have the same requirements for >components as your typical 'enterprise' application, and wouldn't >benefit of l0rdn1kk0n's implementation. > >Martijn > >On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Chris Colman ><chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com> wrote: >> We've ported our app to Wicket 6.2 and are now looking to start using >> Twitter Bootstrap. >> >> Is this a correct summary of the current state Twitter Bootstrap support >> in Wicket? >> >> 1. The Wicket experimental does not provide any component >> implementations. It merely provides a class for convenient inclusion of >> the appropriate CSS + JS resources required for Twitter Bootstrap to >> work via doing this in any page class that requires it: >> @Override >> public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) { >> super.renderHead(response); >> >> Bootstrap.renderHead(response); >> } >> >> 2. The l0rdn1kk0n Wicket-Bootstrap project (pity about the weird >> name!) has a few Wicket components specialized for Twitter Bootstrap use >> and includes support for some free Bootstrap schemes. >> >> Some questions: >> >> How far off before Wicket bootstrap experimental gets some native wicket >> components? >> Could Wicket bootstrap experimental integrate the work of the >> l0rdn1kk0n, bringing in some of it's components to leverage of existing >> work by that project? >> Will Wicket bootstrap experimental be so radically different to the >> l0rdn1kk0n that porting to Wicket bootstrap experimental will be a >> bothersome task when it's ready? >> >> Chris Colman > > > >-- >Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
